Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00279
Original file (BC 2014 00279.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-00279
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Any and all awards earned during his active duty service, 
including the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) be documented in his 
records.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served in Thailand for 90 days and should be eligible for the 
VSM.  

He believes the error or injustice occurred, on or about, 9 Dec 
69, while assigned to the 4609 Supply Squadron.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 10 Feb 66, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular Air 
Force.

According to the applicant’s Airman Performance Report (APR) for 
the period 11 May 67 - 2 Feb 68, he was assigned to the 
6100 Supply Squadron.  The report also notes in Section VII, 
Comments of Reporting Official, the applicant received a letter of 
appreciation for completing a 90-day Temporary Duty (TDY) 
assignment; however, it does not indicate a location.  

The Statement of Personal History form dated 10 Jul 68, reflects 
that from Jul 67 to Aug 67, the applicant reported that he was 
assigned to the 388 Supply Squadron, Korat Air Base, Thailand.

The Air Force Personnel Services (AFPS) website reflects that the 
388 Supply Squadron was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry 
Cross, with Palm (RVNGC, w/P) from 8 Apr 66 – 28 Jan 73.  

On 9 Dec 69, the applicant was honorably discharged, and was 
credited with 3 years and 10 months of active duty service, 
including 1 year, 9 months, and 24 days of foreign service.   


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award 
of the VSM.  DPSID was unable to verify the applicant served in 
the area of eligibility and met the criteria for award of the VSM.  
DPSID was unable to verify he was eligible for any additional 
awards based on his active duty service.  To grant the applicant 
relief would be contrary to the eligibility criteria established 
by DoDM 1348.33, the Secretary of the Air Force, Chief of Staff, 
and/or the War Department.  

The VSM was awarded to all members of the United States Armed 
Forces who served in Vietnam or contiguous waters or airspace 
after 3 Jul 65, and before 28 Mar 73. In addition, personnel 
serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of 
operations in Vietnam during the same time period also were 
eligible for the VSM.  To be eligible, a service member must be: 
permanently assigned, attached, or detailed for one, or more, days 
with an organization participating in or directly supporting 
ground (military) operations; permanently assigned, attached, or 
detailed for one, or more, days aboard a naval vessel directly 
supporting military operations; have actually participated as a 
crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting 
military operations; have served on TDY for 30 consecutive days or 
60 non-consecutive days.  Those time limitations may be waived for 
personnel participating in actual combat operations.

The applicant's APR dated 2 Feb 68 states that he went on a 90-day 
TDY assignment but does not indicate a location.

The only reference to Thailand in the applicant's official 
military personnel record is on page three of a Statement of 
Personal History.  There is an entry from Jul 67 to Aug 67, with 
the 388 Supply Squadron, Korat Air Base, Thailand.  However, there 
is no official documentation referencing this TDY.

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 15 MAY 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate 
the existence of an injustice.  We note DPSID recommends denial 
stating that with the exception of the Statement of History dated 
10 Jul 68, there is no official documentation referencing a TDY to 
Thailand.  While the applicant has not provided conclusive 
evidence that he completed a 90 day TDY to Thailand, it is our 
opinion that the applicant’s APR for the period ending 2 Feb 
68 coupled with AFPS’ website appears to weigh more in favor of 
amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect award of the VSM.  
Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated 
below.  


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that his DD Form 
214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or 
Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 9 Dec 69, discharge, be 
amended in Block 24, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, 
Citations and Campaign Ribbons, Awarded and Authorized, to include 
the Vietnam Service Medal.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-00279 in Executive Session on 20 Nov 14 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 Jan 14.
	Exhibit B.  Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 11 Apr 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 May 14.










Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00408

    Original file (BC 2014 00408.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He served for a little less than four years because of hazardous missions flown in SEA. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence that he completed a TDY to Vietnam, it is our opinion the APR for the period ending 27 Sep 68 coupled with AFPS’s database appear to weigh more in favor of amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02704

    Original file (BC-2012-02704.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This implies the applicant’s unit provided combat support to military operations in the AOE for award of the VSM. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the VSM is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in the AOE. As a member of the 964th Squadron during this time period of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00054

    Original file (BC 2014 00054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. A thorough review of the applicant’s official military record did not locate any documentation verifying award of the VSM. The applicant provided TDY Order-Military, dated 24 Jan 67 assigning him to the 4133rd Bomb Wing (Provisional), Anderson Air Force Base (AFB), Guam; TDY Order-military, dated 22 Feb 68, assigning him to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01558

    Original file (BC 2014 01558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The VSM is awarded to all service members of the United States Armed Forces who served in Vietnam between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73 in the area of eligibility (AOE). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02467

    Original file (BC-2012-02467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also, he knows other veterans who served in Thailand during the same time period and were not in-country; yet, they received both medals. Furthermore, his performance report for the inclusive period 1 Oct 74 to 30 Mar 75, reflects he was assigned to Udorn RTAFB, Thailand; however, this time-frame is outside of the closeout period for award of the VSM and RVCM. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02484

    Original file (BC-2002-02484.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The author recommends the applicant be credited with at least 30 days TDY to Tuy Hoa AB, Vietnam during 18 Mar 68 to 13 Apr 69. If it was stamped in Vietnam any time after 28 Mar 68, the applicant could not have been there for 30 days since his medical records show he was in a fistfight in Taiwan on 18 Apr 68 and was hospitalized until 24 Apr 68. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence verifying that he was TDY...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04364

    Original file (BC-2010-04364.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04364 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request pertaining to credit for service in the Republic of Vietnam, indicating they are unable to verify such...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01843

    Original file (BC 2013 01843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01843 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected as follows: a. A though review of the applicant’s official military personnel records indicated there is no official documentation verifying the applicant...